Showing posts with label Vasiliy Lomachenko. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vasiliy Lomachenko. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

The Legacy of Lomachenko

It's my belief that there's nothing a fighter hates more than being embarrassed in the ring. Many would rather go out on their shield and take a stoppage loss than get toyed with under the bright lights. The ultimate compliment that can be paid to a fighter is not that he won, but that he broke a fighter's spirit. That's the highest level of the sport. And that's what Vasiliy Lomachenko did at his best. 

Perhaps no fight illustrated Lomachenko's greatness in this regard better than his victory over pound-for-pound great Guillermo Rigondeaux. Rigo was the master technician of his day. Featuring hypnotic movement, feints a-plenty and a blistering straight left hand, no one had been able to solve the Sphinx-like puzzle that Rigo presented, at least not until Lomachenko shared the ring with him. 

Lomachenko draped in hardware
Photo courtesy of Mikey Williams/Top Rank

In that fight, the master dancer got bested by an even better dancer. Wherever Rigo moved, Loma moved with him. But better yet, he would greet Rigo with thudding punches and blinding hand speed. Rigondeaux, a proud fighter, quickly understood what he was up against and by the sixth round he could no longer abide. He quit on his stool; the embarrassment was too much for him to handle. 

But that fight was not the only example of Lomachenko breaking an opponent's will. Against undefeated knockout artist Nicholas Walters, Lomachenko dazzled with the type of technical display rarely seen at the highest levels of the sport. Walters could barely lay a glove on Lomachenko and Loma's constant pressure and mastery of angles was too much for Walters. Similarly, he retired in his corner. 

***

Vasiliy Lomachnko was part of a Ukrainian national team that dominated amateur boxing. Arriving on the scene half-a-generation after the Klitschko brothers, Loma, Usyk, Gvozdyk and more brought new elements to the table. Instead of prevailing with thunderous power and punch-counting jabs, this crew incorporated dazzling footwork. They understood the beauty of attacking from angles, of turning opponents, and dominating psychologically as much as physically. The ring was their friend, and they would use every inch of it to gain an advantage. 

Loma landing a body shot on Jorge Linares
Photo courtesy of Mikey Williams/Top Rank

Lomachenko's development was even farther afield from the typical great amateur. There was a period where Lomachenko's father, Anatoly, temporarily paused Lomachenko's boxing training and put him in classical dance. When Lomachenko returned to the sport, he possessed something far more than just solid boxing footwork; he expanded the creative possibilities of how to attack an opponent.

Olympic gold medals ensued and he became the prized international prospect from Top Rank. Lomachenko was so advanced that he fought for a title in his second pro fight (which was a close loss to Orlando Salido) and won a world championship in his third bout, against the speedster Gary Russell Jr., a fighter who would go on to become a long-term champ at featherweight. 

And that was when the Lomachenko mythology really took off. Featuring a purported amateur record of 397-1 and now a titlist in just three fights, there was a sense that Loma possessed a collection of skills that had never been seen before. 

***

Loma announced his retirement last week, which came as a shock to few. Now 37 and with multiple surgeries, as well as a couple of heartbreaking losses, the will to fight on was no longer there. He retired with a record of 18-3, and 14-3 in title fights. Now 14-3 is nothing to sniff at in championship bouts. It's excellent. But among the best of his contemporaries, that record isn't as strong as the Usyks, the Inoues, the Crawfords and the Canelos. 

Two of Loma's losses could be attributed to a combination of naivete and arrogance, both from himself and his father, who trained him. The Salido fight was full of caveats. Salido had blown weight and it had been seen as a deliberate act instead of guy who really tried to get down to the last ounce. I believe that Salido's strategy by winning with physicality, by being the bully, was obvious from the opening round. He was using his weight, crafty inside skills, grappling, and whatever low blows were allowed to take it to the professional novice. It was Loma's (and his father's) real introduction to professional boxing. You might be better technically, Loma, but I'm going to ravage your body by any means necessary. 

To be fair, it was an atrociously refereed fight by Laurence Cole, who should have taken points from Salido for incessant low blows. But Loma and his father didn't handle it appropriately. Loma didn't return fire with low blows; he thought that the fight was some type of "sporting" contest. He and his father didn't work the ref properly. It took Loma until the second half of the fight to power through Salido's tactics and take it to him. Yes, he dominated much of the second half of the fight, and he ultimately made Salido's head look like a popping Pez dispenser. 

However, the damage was done. He lost on two of the three cards, and the judges were correct in awarding Salido the decision. It took too long for Loma to make adjustments. He and his team were not prepared for what Salido brought to the table and suffered a defeat. With more seasoning, both from the fighter and trainer, a win could definitely have been achieved the night. 

Flashing forward several years, Lomachenko faced the unpredictable but talented Teofimo Lopez. The first seven rounds of the fight featured a shockingly low punch output level from Lomachenko. In the first six rounds, Loma didn't even throw 15 punches in a single round. Now absent a knockdown or some ferocious power punching, no fighter is going to win rounds with that type of inactivity.

Teofimo Lopez landing a right uppercut on Loma
Photo courtesy of Mikey Williams/Top Rank

Lopez had figured out a lot regarding how to neutralize Lomachenko. He understood that Loma almost always went to an opponent's left side to start an attack. And as Loma turned, Lopez turned, meeting him with solid left hooks to the body and head. It was the first time that I had ever seen Loma spooked in the ring. 

In time, Loma started to let his hands go and easily won rounds eight through eleven. In the 12th, Lopez bit down and landed pulverizing uppercuts as Loma rushed into the pocket. And I had never seen Loma hit like that before. 

Loma ultimately lost by a unanimous decision, and he deserved to lose, but what followed bordered on delusion. He wouldn't concede the loss after the fight and at worst believed that it should have been a draw. But this wasn't a hard fight to score. And I should also point out that Lopez was credited with landing 50 punches in the 12th round. 

After the fight, Loma had shoulder surgery, and perhaps his injuries played a role in the loss, but it still didn't explain why he was able to let his hands go with abandon in the second half of the fight and not the first if he was so injured. But months later he was asked about the fight again, and he didn't change his stance. Even when he was doing virtually nothing in a round, he still thought that he deserved to win. 

***

I come down the middle on Lomachenko. At his best he was a wonderful talent. He injected style and excitement into the sport. Lomachenko had terrific balance, coordination, timing, and accuracy. His footwork has already been copied by many. You can see his influence particularly on pound-for-pound level talent Jesse "Bam" Rodriguez. 

But the record lacks a lot of top names. Yes, if he would have gotten Mikey Garcia and Gervonta Davis (when both were champ at 130), his resume would look a lot better, and I would have favored him to win both. But there were losses, and a lot of wins against contender-types who weren't necessarily at his level. 

He was great at going forward, but less threatening when on his back foot. Also, there aren't too many complete twelve-round performances. He was terrific in spurts – half a fight here, eight rounds there. He fought in such an up-tempo style that he had problems sustaining it against top competition for 12 rounds. 

We were deprived of some of Loma's peak since he turned pro at the relatively late age of 26. If he could win a pro title in his third bout, it's certainly easy to see that he could have gotten a belt much earlier if he had turned pro at 20 or 21. 

Much of Loma is left to conjecture. We have two-thirds of a career (including a decline where he was still an excellent fighter) and a lot of attribution for what he possibly could have done. He retired with two Olympic gold medals, one of the best amateur careers on record (whatever the actually tally is) and world titles in three weight classes.

Was he a perfect fighter? No. It took him too long to make adjustments in the ring. He had a disrespect for his opponents and an inflated sense of himself that cost him during multiple fights. He lost pivotal 12th rounds in two fights that he needed, against Lopez and Devin Haney. He didn't have the same awareness of scoring that his teammate and fellow champ Oleksandr Usyk has. Loma believed that he was brilliant and that was enough. Usyk understands that the three judges need to be given clear evidence that he's the better fighter. It's Ring IQ that ultimately separates Usyk from Lomachenko. 

Lomachenko will always be remembered as possessing supreme athletic and technical skills. But he is also a reminder that skills don't always pay the bills. Neither Salido nor Lopez was the skilled athlete that Loma was, but they both had their hands raised after fighting him. Loma had evenings of absolute brilliance, where he was untouchable, but when he was touchable, it was much more a roll of the dice. He used psychology to help beat opponents, but those skills also conspired to beat himself. Greatness cannot just be in the mind; it must be shown in the ring, round after round. 

Loma believed that he was an anointed one, the elite talent of his era. Many of his fans believed similarly. The judges didn't always concur. 

Adam Abramowitz is the founder and head writer of saturdaynightboxing.com
He's a member of the Ring Magazine Ratings Panel, the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board, and the Boxing Writers Association of America.
snboxing on twitter. SN Boxing on Facebook  

Sunday, May 21, 2023

Opinions and Observations: Haney-Lomachenko

What I will remember most from the thrilling Devin Haney-Vasiliy Lomachenko fight is how both boxers went for it, how they pushed themselves out of recent comfort zones, that they both understood that they needed to do more than their recent best to win, how they were willing to take risks. They were fighting for their reputations, their legacies, the undisputed lightweight crown, to remain important factors in big-money boxing. There was a lot on the line and they fought like it. 

First, let's discuss the quality of the fight. It was so much better than I anticipated. I was expecting a low-volume, cagey fight with periodic passages of interest. But that's not what happened. Instead, we had a high-energy battle with both fighting with urgency from the opening bell. 

To my surprise, Haney started the fight on the attack. As he has faced better opponents, he has often tried to dominate from the outside. This was the dynamic in both George Kambosos fights. But against Lomachenko, he and his father Bill decided that the best way to fight Loma was to back him up, that Loma was less of a threat when in retreat.

Haney (right) connects with a right hand
Photo courtesy of Mikey Williams/Top Rank

For Loma's part, he clearly understood his problems with slows starts in recent fights and unlike those outings he was bright and vibrant in the first half of Saturday's bout. He was trying to win every round. He was moving much better than he had in his last fight against Ortiz. He certainly didn't look like an aged fighter in the ring on Saturday. 

But what's interesting in how the fight played out is that even though both guys tried to do things differently, the ultimate trajectory of the bout was what most anticipated: Haney, early; Loma, late. Thankfully, the fight was a higher-voltage version of this matchup, but the overall dynamics were as expected. 

As good as Loma was early in the fight, I believe that Haney was better. His straight right hands to the body were pinpoint and easy to see for the judges. He landed a couple of menacing left hooks (he should have used his left hook more in my opinion) and his defense was fantastic. According to CompuBox, Lomachenko landed at a 22% success rate in the fight. Now, use whatever margin of error you want for the punch counting service, but they often have had Lomachenko landing at 40% and above. So, at the very least, Haney was extremely successful in nullifying a lot of what Lomachenko was trying to do on offense, especially in the fight's first half and remember that defense is one of the four scoring criteria for judges. 

As many expected, Lomachenko took over in the second half, but I think that the reasons why were different than anticipated. It wasn't a question of when would Lomachenko finally find the range. He was getting to Haney enough early in the fight. I think that it had to do with Loma's pressure and the repercussions of how Haney decided to start the fight. 

I don't believe that Haney is comfortable yet fighting as a hunter for 12 rounds. At his core, I think that he's a defensive fighter. He expended a lot of energy on the attack in the first half of the fight and I don't think that he had the gas tank or the focus level to sustain his approach for 12 rounds. 

In the second half of the fight, Lomachenko continued to poke and prod with his single left hands and his 2-1 (left hand/right jab) combinations and more started to find their way home. In addition, where Haney was expertly slipping punches and rolling away from the action at the fight's outset, he was a half-step slower in the back half. Later in the fight Lomachenko was able to flurry with multi-punch combinations. And while not everything landed, Haney was close enough and still in range for Lomachenko to throw four or five shots, which illustrates Haney's fatigue.

Loma scoring with a left uppercut
Photo courtesy of Mikey Williams/Top Rank

This was a tremendously difficult fight to score. In the post-fight roundtable, ESPN's Bernardo Osuna stated that he had circled seven rounds in the fight that he thought were swing rounds that could have gone to either fighter. And as high as that number sounds, I think that he's correct. Round-by-round, so many were hard to determine a clear victor. To use CompuBox one more time, in seven of the rounds, the fighters were within two landed punches of each other. However you slice it, those are competitive rounds, where a decisive punch or a short sequence or two could determine the round's winner. 

I scored the fight a draw and could see plausible scenarios for either fighter winning. The judges had Haney winning 115-113, 115-113 and 116-112. Dave Moretti's 116-112 scorecard was widely ridiculed after the fight because of his scoring of the tenth round for Haney, even though that was an obvious Loma round. But even in a vacuum, I think that the legitimate boundaries for scoring the fight were 116 to 112 (or eight rounds to four) for either fighter. There were that many swing rounds. 

In the aftermath of the fight, the tired calls of robberies and corruption were trumpeted by many on social media, as seems to be de rigueur whenever "their guy" loses a 7-5 fight. Boxing does have systemic problems and the quality of judging is one of them, but Haney-Lomachenko wasn't an example of that. Tim Cheatham and David Sutherland's 115-113 scorecards were fine. And if they weren't popular tallies, they were certainly defensible. 

In assessing the performances of each boxer, both fought at a world-class level, but I believe that each had one key aspect that they could have incorporated to make the fight go more in their favor. For Haney, I think that he needed to mix in more of his traditional boxing approach with his attacks on the front foot. Although I respect the Haneys for employing a bold strategy AND it was enough to win the fight, they very easily could have lost it with different judges. And a major reason why I believe that the fight was in jeopardy for them was because Devin burned up too much energy on attack in the early rounds. 

Haney isn't a relaxed fighter in the ring. He features lots of quick movements (sometimes he over-moves) and twitching upper body feints. Not all of these moves are servicing the fight in front of him; often they are manifestations of the pressure in the ring. However, he's far more relaxed when he is on the outside boxing than when he's going after an opponent. If he has a comfort zone, that's it. Perhaps one day he'll be able to become an attacking fighter for 12 rounds, but he's a long way from there right now. 

When looking at Lomachenko's performance, I think what stands out to me is how he ignored Haney's body. After observing how significantly Haney fatigued in the second half, imagine what could have happened if Loma had invested in the body early in the fight. CompuBox had him landing nine body shots all fight! And there were opportunities for him to go to the body, especially in the last six rounds. Yes, he was successful in landing punches throughout the fight, but it's clear that he could have caused more damage, and more sustaining damage, if he had gone to Haney's body.

But fighters not being able to execute at their absolute best is part of why high-level boxing matches can be so compelling; the other guy gets paid too. Loma wanted to start faster and did, but he met a guy who had much more agility at the beginning of a fight. Haney certainly wanted to win convincingly, but he had an opponent with far more championship experience and who had been able to overcome mental and physical fatigue better than his younger counterpart. They did nullify each other to a degree, but they both went for it. There were thrilling passages throughout the fight and each made the other earn everything. 

Ultimately, I will remember the astoundingly high quality of boxing from Haney-Lomachenko. The rounds flew by and it was an absolute pleasure to watch. Haney at 24 showed that he belongs at the elite level of the sport and Lomachenko affirmed his status. Although he's 35, he's still a tremendous boxer and gave Haney all sorts of problems in the second half of the fight. I thought it was a great night for boxing. But for those who want to obsess about a scorecard that was a round off, or how a guy losing a disputed 7-5 fight was a great tragedy, have at it. Please forgive me if I don't join you on your journey of discontent. Reflecting on the fight a day later, I'm still smiling from ear to ear. Haney-Lomachenko was that good.

Adam Abramowitz is the founder and head writer of saturdaynightboxing.com
He's a contributing writer for Ring Magazine, a member of Ring Magazine's Ring Ratings Panel and a Board Member for the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board. 
snboxing on twitter. SN Boxing on Facebook. 

Thursday, May 18, 2023

Haney-Lomachenko: Preview and Prediction

Undisputed lightweight champion Devin Haney (29-0, 15 KOs) defends his belts against former three-weight world champion Vasiliy Lomachenko (17-2, 11 KOs) on Saturday in a mouth-watering matchup between two master boxers at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. Although there were opportunities for this fight to happen when Lomachenko was champion, it will finally take place on Saturday, but now with Lomachenko as the challenger.  

In analyzing the matchup, the first noticeable distinction between the fighters is their ages, with Lomachenko at 35, relatively old for a lightweight, and Haney closer to his athletic prime at 24. In addition to Lomachenko's age, he had participated in over 300 amateur fights before turning pro in 2013. Lomachenko also had shoulder surgery in the recent past and it's fair to question just how much tread is left on his tires. 

In his last fight, Lomachenko struggled with Jamaine Ortiz. Perhaps it was a case that Ortiz had the advantage of familiarity in that he had sparred many rounds with Lomachenko in previous training camps (of course, that advantage could work the other way too). Maybe Ortiz is far better than advertised. Perhaps it was Loma's inactivity. For whatever the reason, it was concerning how easily Ortiz was able to land on Lomachenko during the first six rounds and with big shots as well. Although Lomachenko achieved clear separation over Ortiz in the fight's second half, he had to go to the well to beat a relatively unheralded opponent. 

Haney (left) and Lomachenko during their face-off
Photo courtesy of Mikey Williams

Haney is coming off back-to-back wins over George Kambosos in Australia, the first of which cemented his undisputed status in the division. Although Haney did have convincing victories via the scorecards, I wouldn't claim that he authored complete performances in either fight. While he landed his jab and right hand at will, there were opportunities to go for the stoppage in both fights, but Haney chose to box instead of taking unnecessary risks. 

Now there are two ways to read that. On one hand, one can point to disciplined performances from Haney. He got the job done and didn't take too many hard shots in return. He won in hostile territory and didn't let the magnitude of either event take him away from his game plan. However, he also was playing with fire a little bit in that he was the away fighter content to go for the decision. For instance, in the first fight, it would be hard for a neutral observer to find four rounds to give to Kambosos, yet two judges did. When fights go the distance, there is always a risk of relying on boxing judges; we've all seen what can happen in the sport. 

This highlights a potential issue with Haney in that it doesn't seem as if he's wired to go all out for a stoppage. To this point, he hasn't needed to come from behind to secure a victory, but if needed, can he get a fighter out of there? What if he is behind early against Lomachenko? How does he change the dynamic of the fight? Does he have the punch to do it? Does he have the temperament? 

Another major factor that stands out between Haney and Lomachenko is reach. Haney has a 71" reach, while Loma's is only 65 and a half. That's a significant difference. And more to the point, Haney uses every inch of his reach in the ring to his advantage. He wants to be on the outside and is at his best at range. He's also not going to stick around and trade if an opponent is able to get on the inside. He'll either clinch or get out of Dodge with his superior athleticism. 

This leads to the central dynamic in the matchup. Loma will have to get at least to mid-range on Haney, and he can't count on opportunities for prolonged exchanges. He's going to have to get to a spot and be able to cause damage with a single shot, or a two-punch combination at best. And it's worth pointing out that while Lomachenko is certainly a solid puncher, and a guy who can land with shots that an opponent doesn't anticipate, he's not a knockout puncher at lightweight. He's only had three stoppages in his eight fights in the division. The KO can happen for him, but it's not what most often has occurred for him at lightweight. 

What most likely transpires on Saturday is an intriguing battle of cat-and-mouse, where Haney will look to control the outside while Lomachenko will try to get in range to land something menacing before Haney leaves the pocket. Don't expect flowing combinations from either boxer; this fight will mostly be about who can do best at landing single shots against an opponent on the move. And it's apt that Top Rank has used chess in its marketing for this fight. Saturday's fight could be one for the purists who appreciate the intellectual aspects of boxing. Who will be better at executing his game plan? Who can force the other guy into a mistake? Who has a better Plan B? 

Photo courtesy of Mikey Williams

Another key factor worth considering is Haney's jab and how much of a factor it will be in the fight. In a vacuum, Haney has one of the best jabs in the sport. He essentially won the first Kambosos fight with his stick. However, Lomachenko is not an easy fighter to jab. He rarely stays in one place for too long. And if Haney believes that he can simply jab his way to a victory on Saturday, he will be surprised to find out how quickly that strategy won't work. Haney of course has to believe in his jab. There will be opportunities to land it and score with it, but Lomachenko's lateral movement will nullify it to a degree. Haney is going to have use his entire arsenal of punches to win the fight.

I'm sure Haney will have studied how Teofimo Lopez was able to build a big lead against Lomachenko in the first half of their fight. There, Lopez anticipated Lomachenko's attempts to get outside positioning before going on attack. Lopez turned with him and threw power shots (either right hands to the body or left hooks) where he believed that Loma would go. It was a masterful bit of strategy that kept Lomachenko from letting his hands go with regularity. But even that approach lost its luster after the seventh round. Loma was eventually able to bypass Lopez's strategy and he came on in the second half of the fight. It was only when Lopez found the right uppercut in the 12th that he was able to have sustained success once again in the fight. (Again, an example of Lopez using his entire arsenal to win the fight.) 

The early rounds on Saturday will be key for Haney. He must build a significant lead on the scorecards. He doesn't need to do anything fancy, just land single shots that are easy to see for the judges. Mixing in jabs, left hooks and right hands, he should be able to have success in the first third of the fight until Lomachenko can find a consistent pathway to get past his length. 

Although Haney doesn't need to throw a high volume in the first half of the fight, he has to win rounds definitively. He must maintain his focus and not allow Lomachenko, who fights in spurts as he has aged, to steal rounds. 

The back half of the bout is where I believe that we will see the fight's drama. Loma, like many master boxers, does his best work in the second half. He will have figured out what can work to get in range. In the fight's final third, I believe that Lomachenko will be able to let his hands go more freely and finally have success with combinations. 

It's not a secret that Jorge Linares clipped Haney in the second half of their fight and Jo Jo Diaz had success against Haney in the back half as well. However, you'll notice that both of those fighters still lost against Devin. Whatever success they had, it wasn't enough. The question will be if Lomachenko can hurt Haney. Can he drop him for a 10-8 round? Can he stop him? If yes can be answered to any of those questions, the path to winning will be considerably easier for him. If not, he'll be playing a game of catch-up against a savvy fighter who doesn't provide many openings for his opponents. 

Prediction: 

I think that this fight will be won in the fight's first half. I see Haney using his legs, reach and discipline to win the early rounds clearly. He'll have a significant working margin after the sixth round; he'll need it too. Haney is a supremely talented boxer, but he does fall into offensive patterns that can be counteracted. I think that Lomachenko will have several convincing moments in the second half and he'll even build a head of steam. But ultimately, I don't believe that Lomachenko has a big enough punch to change the fight in a significant way and I don't think that Haney will make enough mistakes to give up his lead. Haney will see his way to the finish line in a fight that tests his resolve. It won't be a performance that inspires 100% confidence, but he will do enough in my opinion to get his hand raised at the end of the fight.

Devin Haney defeats Vasiliy Lomachenko by a competitive decision: 8 rounds to 4 or 7 rounds to 5. 

Adam Abramowitz is the founder and head writer of saturdaynightboxing.com
He's a contributing writer for Ring Magazine, a member of Ring Magazine's Ring Ratings Panel and a Board Member for the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board. 
snboxing on twitter. SN Boxing on Facebook.

Thursday, March 3, 2022

Loma and Usyk to Ukraine; Growing Pains for DAZN

Oleksandr Usyk and Vasiliy Lomachenko are among the best fighters in the sport.  Both won gold medals in the Olympics and world title belts in multiple divisions in the professional ranks. And both are in line for huge opportunities in their next fight. Usyk, a current unified heavyweight titlist, has a potential eight-figure purse for the Anthony Joshua rematch, and many believe that Lomachenko is in pole position for a fight with unified lightweight titlist George Kambosos. 

These plans, however, are now on hold. Usyk and Lomachenko have returned to Ukraine to defend their homeland against Russia. This act is extraordinary on many levels. Lomachenko and Usyk are sporting heroes in Ukraine. There is tremendous value in them continuing to ply their trade professionally, to represent their country positively on the international sporting stage. For their upcoming fights they would have the opportunity to speak out against the invasion and have platforms and visibility for their perspective. Public relations and propaganda (and I don't use the world negatively in this context) are vital tools for every government and cause.

Oleksandr Usyk after his victory over Anthony Joshua
Photo courtesy of Mark Robinson

Furthermore, even if Usyk and Lomachenko did decide to be apolitical and not talk directly about the crisis in their homeland, they could still be looked at as role models for their country and throughout the sporting world. Continuing to fight would have value both within Ukraine and in the larger international framework. But these roads have not been taken. 

What Usyk and Lomachenko are doing deserves praise on the highest level. They are passing up millions of dollars and perhaps, if something unfortunate does happen to them during the war, their future ability to earn from boxing. That money could be used for their families for generations to come, to improve their standing. 

Each has sacrificed financial rewards and the glories of professional sport at the highest level for a greater perceived purpose. There was no mandate for them to take up arms, but each believed that the defense of his country was far more important than money, fame or the trappings of boxing. Here's hoping that both emerge from the war healthy, successful in their endeavors, with their families intact, and with the ability to delight millions of boxing fans around the world once again.  

***

Last week, the streaming service DAZN announced that they would utilize pay per view as part of their boxing product offering, starting with Saul "Canelo" Alvarez's next fight with Dmitry Bivol. To those who follow the sport closely, this change was not a surprise. After all, pay per view has been the bread-and-butter way to maximize boxing revenues for over 30 years. But the announcement represented a marked change for DAZN, which featured the "end of pay per view" as part of their marketing. 

DAZN entered boxing in 2018 and has relied on annual or monthly subscriptions for revenue. They also feature other sports in various markets including soccer (football) and darts, among others. Working with boxing promoters such as Matchroom and Golden Boy, DAZN has broadcasted a substantial amount of boxing content. For diehard fans of the sport, the company has to this point provided a lot of value; however, boxing diehards don't make the financial world go round – there just aren't enough of them. Boxing rights fees, although cheaper than many other sports, add up and enormous contracts given to Matchroom, Golden Boy (chiefly for Canelo's services, since re-engineered after Canelo left Golden Boy) and Gennadiy Golovkin haven't set the boxing world aflame. In addition, the financial outlays for soccer rights fees often include seven or eight zeroes attached to them.



In public disclosures, the company has reported losses of over a billion dollars in both 2019 and 2020. Although billionaire principal Len Blavatnik has recapitalized the company on numerous occasions, DAZN is awash in red ink. In this context, the move to boxing pay per view is understandable and even necessary. 

Much of this has been anticipated by those in and around boxing, but for some reason DAZN was the last one to the party. Major American and British-based networks (Showtime, Sky, BT Sport, Fox and ESPN) have all utilized pay per view as part of their business model. They all know that big events and the maximization of revenues from those events are an important reason to broadcast boxing. Although not every pay per view will be profitable or will turn enough of a profit to affect a company's earnings materially, when a promoter and network hit a home run on a pay per view, the financial rewards are seven or even eight figures; that's real money.

DAZN has tried a number of different pricing strategies and structures since their inception. In America, their monthly fee is now up to $19.99, but they feature a discount for those who get the yearly subscription. They have announced that pay per views will be $20 less for existing subscribers vs. those who buy just the event itself. Yet, all of this is starting to sound very steep. 

It's not cheap to be a boxing fan. Numerous networks and streaming platforms broadcast meaningful fights throughout the world. But, choices have to be made. In England, Channel 5 is showing free fights. Millions of sports fans in the U.K. already have Sky because of the Premier League. In America, almost everyone has ESPN. Showtime has been broadcasting top-level boxing for decades. Can DAZN make itself essential? 

If DAZN plans to stick around in crowded sports markets, it's going to need more content, and better content. That isn't going to be cheap. And of course that's one strategy: More! Bigger! Better!

But maybe it's also time for the want-to-be "Netflix of Sports" to recalibrate. There's value in the boxing that they broadcast. Much of it is additive in that fans wouldn't get it anywhere else. But is that worth $19.99 a month? DAZN's loyal subscribers in the U.S. have already experienced multiple price increases. How many fans have they alienated in this short time? While DAZN is chasing a broader slice of sports fans, if they continue to antagonize their hardcore base, that will have significant ramifications as well. 

DAZN needs some immediate public relations relief and they have to stop treating their subscribers with contempt. Boxing fans are used to paying money for fights, but they don't like being misled. DAZN has made a number of important errors since their entrance into boxing, many of them unforced. Now, it's imperative that they agree on a coherent strategy going forward. Are they actually in the boxing business to stay? If it's part of their long-term strategy, they better start showing more respect to their customers. And if they're just in boxing to get a foothold in the sports landscape, that's fine too, but then maybe they shouldn't be throwing around as much money for lesser fights. Right now, they seem to be on the fence, not a good place to be.  

I don't have personal animosity toward any boxing broadcaster. I want them all to succeed, because that would mean a healthier sport. DAZN is a welcome addition to boxing and despite their mistakes they have provided many memorable fights. But I think it would be a more palatable experience for everyone if they stopped shooting themselves in the foot and figured out exactly what they want to be doing with boxing. And then after that, maybe they should communicate honestly with their subscribers going forward. That would be a good place to start. 

Adam Abramowitz is the founder and head writer of saturdaynightboxing.comHe's a member of Ring Magazine's Ring Ratings Panel and a Board Member for the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board. 
snboxing on twitter. SN Boxing on Facebook. 

Monday, December 13, 2021

Catching My Eye: Loma, Benn, Donaire, Edwards

Height and reach are often used in boxing as proxies for size. These measures can help explain specific advantages or disadvantages that a fighter may have in a given matchup. But let's remember that these tangible measurements are just "proxies," which of course comes from the same word family as "approximate" – an estimate, not exact. Height and reach are only rough guides; they are not the final word for determining or in some cases even adequately describing size. 

For example, let's take a look at Saturday's matchup between Vasiliy Lomachenko and Richard Commey. Commey had a one-inch height and five-inch reach advantage over Lomachenko. On paper, Commey's reach advantage seemed significant. But watching the fight play out, it became obvious that Commey's reach wasn't going to be a factor at all. Not a committed jabber, Commey has made his living with power shots. And even if that were not the case, I can't think of any opponent who has controlled Lomachenko with a jab. He's just not in one place long enough for that punch to be a factor. 

Loma (left) getting work done on the inside
Photo courtesy of Mikey Williams

Much of Lomachenko-Commey took place at mid-range or closer. And when there was clinching on the inside, it was Loma, the "featherweight" or the "junior lightweight," who was manhandling the supposedly bigger fighter. Lomachenko scored the fight's only knockdown in the seventh when he maneuvered himself in the clinch to create an opening and landed a huge, short left hand. 

Later on in the round, Lomachenko had Commey trapped in a corner. Commey tried his best to get out of that position, but Lomachenko's punching, use of distance and physical strength wouldn't allow Commey to get to safety. Commey just barely survived the seventh, but that round illustrated the folly of using size proxies as gospel. Loma's core strength and how he applied it made it clear who was the more imposing physical fighter – and it wasn't the guy who has been a big lightweight throughout most of his career. 

In a strong performance, Lomachenko won via a wide unanimous decision. This fight should be a reminder that he's far more than just hand speed and clever angles. He was causing damage with his fists, sure, but he also used his body to dominate his opponent. Hopefully, this will help end the lazy narrative that Lomachenko isn't a real lightweight. He was a physical force in the ring on Saturday, beating up a former lightweight champion. To me it doesn't matter what division he started his professional career; what I saw was a fighter who was beating up a strong lightweight with his body. At no point did Lomachenko look overmatched physically in the fight. If anything, Commey had never experienced that type of physical depletion in the ring. 

***

Conor Benn was not viewed as a serious threat to the top of the welterweight division 18 months ago. The son of a famous fighter, he had a strong surname and some rudimentary power. He helped sell tickets and generated some casual interest on Matchroom cards. 

But a funny thing has happened over his last four fights, he has improved significantly. Under trainer Tony Sims' guidance, Benn has added numerous facets to his game. He's now much more than a crude knockout artist. He puts punches together well. He invests in body shots. His footwork has become more functional and less ponderous. He has learned to pace himself better. 


Benn (left) knocking out Algieri in the 4th round
Photo courtesy of Mark Robinson


Benn knocked out former junior welterweight champ Chris Algieri on Saturday with a perfect one-two. The final right hand landed like a missile and Algieri, who is usually a durable fighter, was left motionless on the canvas for a few brief moments. He wasn't in any type of position to beat the count. 

As Benn has been moved steadily up the welterweight division, the next test for him is to see if his chin can hold up. To this point, you won't find a real puncher on his resume, and I have to believe that's not coincidental. If he can take a punch, he will have a chance at the top of the division. His offense can be explosive and he has fight-ending power. But if his beard isn't up to snuff, much of that won't matter. It's time to see what the kid has. There is no easy way to get a belt at welterweight, and the handbrakes need to come off. Let's see if Conor can take a punch. We know he can throw one. 

***

Boxing presents infinite opportunities for those inclined to be angry to express themselves: subpar matchups; sanctioning body shenanigans, poor judging, the best not fighting the best, etc. And there will always be time to return to those areas of discontent. However, let's also not lose the forest through the trees; boxing continues to offer sublime pleasures. On Saturday, we had another opportunity to witness one of boxing's best treats – Nonito Donaire's left hook. 

Donaire, still a titlist at 39, ended yet another opponent on Saturday with his signature shot. Reymart Gaballo fought with determination and steel in the first three rounds of their fight. It was clear that he wanted to defeat his Filipino countryman and announce himself on the world stage. But the problem that so many fighters encounter with Donaire is that when they throw their right hand often, there will be an opportunity for Donaire to land his left hook.  

Donaire (right) landing his signature left hook
Photo courtesy of Esther Lin

Donaire connected with the left to the body in the fourth. He actually left his feet to land the shot, which connected with a sickening thud. Gaballo dropped to the canvas. He tried getting up at "8," but the pain was too much and went right back down. 

In my opinion Donaire's left hook and Deontay Wilder's right hand are the best two punches in boxing today. Both fighters have losses on their resume; they have and can be beaten. But they have the potential to knock out any single opponent in front of them with their best shot. Donaire doesn't have the speed that he once did. His defense is now just adequate. But he still has that crushing left hook. It's a special punch. And it was my pleasure to watch him display his prodigious gift one more time. 

***

Flyweight champ Sunny Edwards has great feet, among the very best in boxing. And in addition to his considerable athleticism, he understands range very well. Without a huge punch he knows that his best chance of winning any given fight will be on the outside. His opponent on Saturday, Jayson Mama, understood this as well. Mama spent the first four rounds of their fight doing exactly what he needed to do against a much faster foe: going to the body, making the fight rough and rugged, and using the dark arts to gain an advantage. 

The opening third of the fight was a huge gut check for Edwards. Mama rabbit punched him a lot, went low with shots and wasn't shy about leading with his head. By the third round Edwards had a huge cut on his hairline from a headbutt. Mama made these rounds competitive. In addition to the fouls and grappling, he landed some eye-catching chopping right hands. 

But then it was almost as if a switch turned on for Edwards and he said to himself: I don't need to be in this type of fight. He spent the last seven rounds or so of the bout in cruise control, dominating the action from the outside. By the end of the match, Mama looked demoralized. It was even hard to remember that Mama had success in the early-going; it had been that long ago. Edwards wound up winning a wide unanimous decision and he demonstrated his class in being able to make in-fight adjustments. 

To beat Edwards, an opponent is going to have to have great legs AND a big punch. Flyweight currently isn't a deep division, but the titleholders are very good. Fights against fellow titlists such as Junto Nakatani and Julio Cesar Martinez would be terrific matchups. 

Although Edwards will never have the physicality to beat the best in an inside fight, few in the entire sport have the combination of his foot speed and boxing ability from the outside. For fans of that outside pure-boxing style (which isn't everyone's cup of tea), Edwards should be a must-watch. And even if you don't like watching a boxer who moves so much, it's still impressive to observe a fighter who has mastered a particular style so comprehensively.

Adam Abramowitz is the founder and head writer of saturdaynightboxing.comHe's a member of Ring Magazine's Ring Ratings Panel and a Board Member for the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board. 
snboxing on twitter. SN Boxing on Facebook.