There
is a minimum punch volume threshold where if a fighter strays below that line,
he can't expect to win a decision on the cards. Yes, there could be outliers. Scenarios have occurred where a fighter refuses to throw punches in the ring. There, the marginally more active boxer (even if he is below the threshold) gets the victory. Or perhaps both guys decide to engage in a staring contest
for the duration of a fight, and someone has to win. But by and large, there
is a threshold. I've always placed that line at 20 punches per
round. If a guy can't meet that lowly number and his opponent is decidedly
more active, the busier one will get the decision, regardless of quality or
effectiveness. On Saturday, Wladimir Klitschko averaged only 19.25 punches
thrown per round and, as follows, he lost.
Before
I get accused of not understanding how boxing is scored, let me take a step
back before further elaborating on my point. Yes, boxing is scored on the
10-point must system, where the winner gets 10 points and the loser gets 9 (point deductions, knockdowns and even rounds could lead to a different number). After the bout concludes, the points are added up and there is your
winner. I get this. I understand all of it. However, what I maintain is that at
the low extreme of punch volumes, judges won't award rounds to the inactive
guy, unless he happens to score a knockdown or really cause damage. Absent
those factors, the busier fighter will win the decision (again, regardless of quality or effectiveness) against a guy who
refuses to let his hands go beyond the minimum threshold rate.
I don't
think that my point is particularly controversial but it should be axiomatic.
If you can't throw 20 punches per round, you can't win a decision, or, to play
just a little bit nicer, you shouldn't expect to win a decision. This accounts
for outliers, force majeure, etc.
Tyson
Fury averaged 30.9 punches thrown per round against Klitschko. It certainly
wasn't a robust number but that's a total more often seen in a heavyweight
fight. He was credited with landing 34 more punches in a match where not much
happened; that's a significant advantage. I rarely belabor punch stats like I
have here but in this particular fight, the totals were revealing.
A
variety of factors influenced Klitschko's inactivity and I'll list many of them: Fury's constant feints
and head movement didn't allow for a clean target to be hit. Wladimir works
off his jab and when he couldn't land that punch, he was reluctant to open up with
other shots. Klitschko has also never been a body puncher. Thus, one established avenue of breaking down an opponent with head
movement was off-limits because of his predilections. Fury's size was another
contributing factor to Klitschko's inactivity; Wlad didn't have a reach advantage. Fury stayed out
of the pocket and wasn't in Klitschko's range very often.
Fury also switched up from orthodox to southpaw and moved his gloves to unusual
positions. These actions confused Klitschko, making him hesitant.
Let's also not discount Klitschko's age (39). Furthermore, he was unwilling to
take risks and he lacked creativity when "Plan A" didn't work.
In
short, it was a comprehensive loss. Fury beat Klitschko and Klitschko also beat
himself. By not throwing punches, Klitschko didn't give himself a chance to win on the scorecards. Even when the fight
was slipping away from him, he refused to make adjustments. It was the same story most of the fight (with the exception of a belated
charge in the 12th round). Klitschko essentially stared at Fury, who confounded
him with movement, angles and his physical attributes. While Klitschko remained
foggy in the ring, Fury landed quick jabs, hooks and two-punch combinations.
The
three judges awarded Fury eight rounds, eight rounds and nine rounds,
respectively. I gave him 11 rounds on my card, with the acknowledgment that rounds 1 and 8 in particular could've gone for Klitschko. Ultimately, it was an embarrassing way for a proud champion to
lose his title. Not until the last round did Klitschko fight with any urgency. That he raised his arms at the end of the match was a sign of
self-delusion; an effort such as that will not win a prizefight.
Klitschko-Fury was also a tale of two corners. Peter Fury concocted a
great game plan. Team Fury took away Klitschko's jab, one of the best weapons
in the sport. By remaining out of the pocket, Klitschko couldn't find any
consistency with the jab, which precluded him from gaining confidence. Tyson
must also take credit for remaining disciplined throughout the fight. Even as
he was piling up the rounds on the scorecards, he didn't make a lot of mistakes
or get greedy with his offense. He put in his work and got out of the pocket. To his credit, he
refused to turn the bout into a bomb-throwing contest. He was well prepared and fully bought into Peter's strategy.
On the
other side, Klitschko's trainer, Jonathon Banks, had one of the worst corner
performances I've seen in 2015. As the rounds continued to slip away, there
was no urgency from him until the 10th round. In the break between the eighth and ninth, he was still telling Wlad to "double up the jab, head and
body." Of course, Wlad never jabs to the body. I repeat. HE NEVER JABS TO
THE BODY! Even if they had worked on that in the gym, he doesn't do it in fights.
And let me add one more point of emphasis: HE WAS WELL BEHIND IN THE FIGHT! The
time for being cute with the jab was over. Something dramatic had to change for
Klitschko to have a chance of winning and the jab wasn't the answer.
Klitschko's former trainer, Emanuel Steward (also, Banks' mentor), exhorted his fighters when it was appropriate. On Saturday,
Klitschko needed a forceful kick in the ass but Banks acted in the corner like
he did as a fighter: someone just going through the motions.
Due to contractual factors, a rematch of the fight is expected next. If Klitschko does want to entertain another
Fury foray, he'd be well advised to switch trainers. At 39, Wlad's not
going to learn new things technically. However, he needs a trainer who can connect
with him emotionally and rouse him when needed. Banks is not that person. This
decision will tell us a lot about Klitschko. If he maintains the status quo,
settling for the comfortable and the familiar, he's signaling self-contentment
with a mediocre effort. To me, that's not the formula for a different outcome.
Let me
make a final comment about Fury. Over the last few years, he has refined his
technique and made vast improvements with his ring generalship. He used to
fight like a goon, where he would swing wildly and not respect his opponent. As
he has upped his competition level, a new-found seriousness has made its way
into his repertoire and it's a welcome addition. He's no longer jabbing from
too close or leaving himself wide open after throwing the right hand. In addition,
for such a big man, he can be surprisingly agile in the ring. When he switches
to southpaw, he doesn't do it as a gimmick. It's tactical and done with
purpose. There were many (myself included) who underestimated Fury. The joke
was on us.
***
Speaking
of searching for a new trainer, former super middleweight champion Lucian Bute
hooked up with brothers Howard and Otis Grant this year in an attempt to
rejuvenate his career. Marked by losses, injuries and inactivity, the last few
years hadn't gone well for Bute. However, he looked like a fresh fighter on Saturday against beltholder James DeGale, putting forth a spirited
effort in a competitive loss.
For the
first time since his shutout of Glen Johnson in 2011, Bute fought with
confidence against a good opponent. He remained aggressive throughout the night
and didn't cower after receiving return fire. On offense, he featured a solid
left hand and a blistering right hook to the head and body. His other weapons,
such as his jab and uppercut, were less successful.
Ultimately,
the offensive creativity and athleticism of DeGale were enough to swing the
fight in his favor. How often do you see lead-hand uppercut/lead-hand hook
combinations? In other instances, DeGale would switch to a conventional stance
and land the following combination: right uppercut (then switch to southpaw)/right
hook/left uppercut. I noted specific instances where DeGale threw seven- and nine-punch combinations – and this was against a guy with good power! He also doubled up with the uppercut in many exchanges.
These are the types of punches and combinations thrown by a supremely confident
fighter and one who has a number of athletic gifts.
There
were many exceptional rounds in the fight, including the 8th, 9th, 11th and
12th. Both boxers were fighting for their futures; DeGale wanted to cement his
status as a young champion on the rise and Bute needed to reestablish his
relevance at the top level of the sport. As good as Bute performed throughout the night, DeGale was consistently better. In the end, DeGale prevailed (scores
were 116-112, 117-111 and 117-111; I had it 116-112) but both fighters truly won.
Bute remains a formidable challenger.
Sure, he wasn't perfect on Saturday. His defense is still leaky (way too much
room between his gloves) and he isn't the most instinctual fighter out there;
it took him half the match to launch an attack when DeGale turned conventional. But he showed moxie and he still has heavy hands. This "loss"
was far more impressive than were many of his title defenses.
As for
DeGale, he has now defeated Andre Dirrell and Lucian Bute in 2015, a damn fine
showing. Over the last four fights, DeGale has discovered his ring identity. No longer a
cute boxer or one beset by problems of consistency and confidence, he has now
become one of the best boxer-punchers in the sport. He features a blistering
offensive arsenal and doesn't shy away from exchanges. Moreover, his
willingness to leave England in search of larger opportunities is refreshing in
an age of protected fighters. He's in a division that features a number of
enticing matchups, such as Arthur Abraham, George Groves (the lone boxer to
defeat him), Badou Jack and Callum Smith. Here's hoping that he builds on 2015
next year. Not only has he emerged as one of the must-see fighters in the sport,
he's quickly ascending to the ranks of its supreme practitioners.
Adam Abramowitz is the head writer and founder of saturdaynightboxing.com.
Adam Abramowitz is the head writer and founder of saturdaynightboxing.com.
He is also a member of the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board.
@snboxing on twitter, SN Boxing on Facebook
Contact Adam at saturdaynightboxing@hotmail.com @snboxing on twitter, SN Boxing on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment