We know
who they are: Laurence Cole, Luis Pabon, Russell Mora, Ian John-Lewis and Vic
Drakulich. These are the bad boxing referees. There are other elderly officials,
like Lou Moret and Stanley Christodoulou, who lack the athleticism and sharp
decision making to referee fights but are still capable judges. All of these
officials continue to harm the sport with impunity. Their poor
performances are not a secret within the industry yet they still get plum
assignments – and boxing continues to suffer as a result.
Not all
of these officials transgress in the same way. Mora plays favorites. John-Lewis
and Drakulich lose control of fights. Moret seems to make things up as he
goes. Cole also plays favorites and lets fighters take unhealthy punishment. A
guy like Jay Nady believes that fight fans come to watch him. Pabon is the
definition of arbitrary in his enforcement of rules. Seemingly 80% of British refs
will stop a fight if the "B-Side" (especially an international one)
looks at them funny.
Even
the best referees have their faults in the ring. Steve Smoger can be
laissez-faire in breaking up clinches. Kenny Bayless may miss a knockdown every
now and then. Tony Weeks can be a little slow in stopping
fights. Robert Byrd rarely catches the rough stuff in clinches. Jack Reiss
can be a tad officious. But time after time these refs are in the ring when
wonderful fights occur; it's not a coincidence. They establish a rapport with
fighters and their teams. They make strong commands in the ring and their
judgment is respected. In addition, they aren't looking for reasons to deduct
points. That doesn't mean that they always have an easy day at the office but they
rarely let a fight spin out of control. Their records speak for
themselves.
Vic
Drakulich will never be in the exalted group of the best referees in the
sport. Saturday, where he helped ruin a perfectly good fight between Brandon Rios and Diego Chaves, was another illustration as to why he is considered a weak official. One bad judgment begat several additional ones, creating
a chain of poor decision making. Drakulich wound up disqualifying Chaves and it
was all perfectly avoidable.
In the
third round, Drakulich needlessly deducted a point from Chaves for holding.
Sure, there were clinches in the fight, but not an uncommon amount. And it's not as if there wasn't action in the match. Chaves was
throwing bombs from the outside and Rios did some great work in close
quarters. Just two rounds later, Drakulich deducted a point from Rios when
he tackled Chaves to the ground during a clinch. Again, these things happen in
fights and it wasn't as if tackling was occurring throughout the bout. That
point deduction sure felt like a makeup call. Ask yourself, if Drakulich hadn't
deducted the first point from Chaves, would he have then taken the point away
from Rios? I think the answer is obvious.
Then
things really started to devolve in the ring, with both fighters fouling with
increased frequency and then working the ref to try and get more points
deducted from their opponent. Rios kept butting and going low. Chaves butted
and thumbed Rios in the eyes on a few occasions. Drakulich deducted another
point from Chaves in the seventh. By the ninth, he had seen enough and stopped
the bout. Rios, the house fighter, was awarded the victory.
The
grand irony of Saturday's debacle is that Bayless, one of the best in the
business, was reffing on the undercard of Rios-Chaves, working the
Jessie-Vargas-Anton Novikov fight. Were the Nevada State Athletic Commission
sharp, it would have put the better official in the main event, especially
since Rios' bouts often involve rough, inside fighting and cuts. Vargas-Novikov wound up resembling a high-level amateur fight where both boxers were busy trying to
score points with single shots. Any competent official could have reffed that
one.
Drakulich's
performance on Saturday epitomizes the root cause of bad refereeing:
weak/obtuse commissions and sanctioning organizations. Very few referees are
disciplined for poor performances. I can't remember a high-level referee in
modern boxing who has been fired. Even when refs are punished, they, in
time, will resume their previous positions. Russell Mora was formally
disciplined for refusing to call low blows during the first Abner Mares-Joseph
Agbeko fight. Laurence Cole was suspended for telling Juan Manuel Marquez that he
was ahead during a fight. Yet they both continue to work. Cole still gets some
of the biggest fights in Texas as well as many international assignments from
the sanctioning bodies and Mora continues to officiate plenty of fights in Nevada.
Again, these are repeat offenders.
These
refs routinely make poor decisions in their fights but the refusal of boxing's
bureaucracies to mete out sufficient discipline ensures that bad officials
continue to spoil good fights. With the right ref, Rios-Chaves could have been
a fight of the year candidate. Instead, boxing was left with a result that
dissatisfied all parties. Now, there are certainly fights that warrant a
disqualification. Rios' bout against Anthony Peterson was a good example (and
one where Russell Mora acted appropriately in disqualifying Peterson for myriad
low blows). But Saturday was not such a fight. It spiraled out of control
because Drakulich decided to take points away for minor infractions and then
when more serious ones occurred, he was left without recourse. He failed to
effectively communicate with the corners between rounds about stopping the
rough stuff and he didn't garner the respect of the combatants.
Drakulich
will be called into the Nevada State Athletic Commission on Monday to review
his performance in the fight. He might even get a slap on the wrist. But I
doubt that there will be a suspension or meaningful discipline; I'd love to be
wrong.
It’s worth noting that the last example of proactive discipline from
the Nevada State Athletic Commission was the removal of C.J. Ross as a judge.
But remember, the former executive director of the commission, Keith Kizer,
initially defended Ross' horrid scorecard for Mayweather-Alvarez. It was only
when political pressure was exerted upon Kizer from parties above him that
definitive action was taken place. Officially, Ross was put on "indefinite
leave" but that was just a face-saving measure. She hasn't judged in
Nevada again.
Nevada
acted forcefully after that debacle only because it was embarrassed in the
highest-profile fight of the year. Rios-Chaves does not come close to meeting
that standard. Here's hoping that the commission's new executive director, Robert Bennett,
imposes strong discipline on Drakulich, but I wouldn't bet on it.
In the
next 12 months, we will continue to see fights ruined by Cole, Pabon, Mora, et
al., but the sport will keep humming along. The WBA and WBO love Pabon and send him around the world. Christodoulou is one of the WBA's favored refs
for international assignments. The WBC still brings Cole to Japan every so
often. Drakulich was somehow the 2010 WBC ref of the year.
Unless some major fiasco occurs that threatens the sanctity of
the sport (and run-of-the-mill poor decision making by
referees does not count here), these bad officials will continue to harm boxing
without any serious consequences. Commissions and sanctioning body organizations are loath to
rock the boat. They have created and upheld a rigid and entrenched tenure
system that would make even public sector unions blush. Once a referee is part of the club, he never leaves until it is his decision to do so. Because the commissions and sanctioning bodies refuse to impose discipline, we all lose. The result of these actions, or
inactions, to put it more accurately, degrades the sport.
And Vic Drakulich will be back on your TV soon enough.
Adam Abramowitz is the head writer and founder of saturdaynightboxing.com.
He is also a member of the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board.
Contact Adam at saturdaynightboxing@hotmail.com
@snboxing on twitter
Follow Saturday Night Boxing on Facebook:
www.facebook.com/SaturdayNightBoxing
And Vic Drakulich will be back on your TV soon enough.
Adam Abramowitz is the head writer and founder of saturdaynightboxing.com.
He is also a member of the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board.
Contact Adam at saturdaynightboxing@hotmail.com
@snboxing on twitter
Follow Saturday Night Boxing on Facebook:
www.facebook.com/SaturdayNightBoxing
It seems that many boxing fans have either forgotten that a boxing match is governed by rules or are simply ignorant of these rules.
ReplyDeleteChaves and many of those commenting about his disqualification by the referee are probably not aware of or may have overlooked, conveniently or otherwise, the fact that:
(1) The Unified Rules of Boxing of the Association of Boxing Commissions specifically provide that “IF THE REFEREE FEELS THAT THE BOXER HAS CONDUCTED HIMSELF IN AN UNSPORTSMAN-LIKE MANNER, HE MAY STOP THE BOUT AND DISQUALIFY THE BOXER;” and
(2) The Association of Boxing Commission Referee Rules and Guidelines also specifically provide on Disqualification, in essence, that: A boxer will lose by DISQUALIFICATION when he or she has: fouled and caused harm to his or her opponent; continually refused to follow the rules; and continually disobeyed the Referee.
It is what the referee FEELS about the conduct of a boxer that is the basis of his action and if the referee in the Rios-Chaves fight felt that Chaves conducted himself in an unsportsmanlike manner but did not feel the same about Rios, he is absolutely entitled to what he felt and nobody has the right to say that the referee is wrong because feelings are personal in nature and subjective in character.
It must also be noted that the Association of Boxing Commissions Referee Rules and Guidelines allow disqualification of a boxer by the referee if the boxer fouled. The rules, as written, did not make it mandatory for the referee to even make a warning prior to a disqualification by reason of a foul. In the case of Chaves however, he and his corner were previously warned by the referee that Chaves will be disqualified if he continues with his infractions. Chaves definitely fouled a lot and on this reason alone, the disqualification was very much justified.
Further, it is obvious that Chaves continually refused to follow the rules. In the statements he made after the bout, Chaves in effect or in essence admitted albeit impliedly, that he actually was continually not following the rules. On this point alone, his disqualification was justified.
Further still, Chaves continually disobeyed the Referee. I clearly saw this and others like me who is a boxing fan but not a fan of Rios or Chaves probably saw this also. On this point alone, the disqualification of Chaves was justified.
To all those who think that the referee was wrong in disqualifying Chaves: please read the applicable rules and if you have already done so, please read them again. For all those who think that the Unified Boxing Rules and the Referee Rules and Guidelines of the Association of Boxing Commissions do not make sense, then you all can lobby that the rules be changed but until the rules are changed, please stop saying that the referee was wrong in disqualifying Chaves. The feeling of the referee in the Rios-Chaves fight can neither be right nor wrong and if the law entitled him to disqualify Chaves on the basis of what he felt, the referee committed no wrong. This is the law and while this may be hard or may be foolish, this remains to be the law until this is changed. Dura lex sed lex.
Personally, I would like to see that clinching be absolutely banned and that it be made the law that all boxers at all times observe clean fighting, follow the rules, heed the referee and display sportsmanlike conduct under pain of being disqualified and their pay being forfeited to be returned to the paying public if they do not do so. I pay to watch a boxing match, and a lot of other people probably do so, not to see 2 boxers wrestle, act dirty or conduct themselves in unsportsmanlike manner and when any of them do so, I and those who paid to see the match are legally cheated by the fighter, by the promoters and by the organizers of the match, if the money paid is not proportionately refunded.