There's
a fascinating comparison to make regarding the relative confidence levels of
Manny Pacquiao and Tim Bradley in their two fights. Twenty-two months ago,
Pacquiao got off to a rousing start, banging Bradley around the ring with hard
left hands and superior hand speed. Bradley got spooked and went into a
four-corner defensive style in the last third of the fight. Perhaps out of
overconfidence, Pacquiao didn't feel the need to pursue Bradley in the closing
moments with his typical fury. Bradley did enough to survive the fight, win a
few rounds and gain an unjust unpopular split decision victory.
In
Saturday's rematch, Bradley was the one who opened the fight brimming with
confidence. Landing a series of right hands from rounds three to six, Bradley
showed that he could get to Pacquiao with his power shots and match him in the
hand speed department. In many of these rounds, Bradley was the one
successfully pushing forward and forcing Pacquiao into an unfamiliar role of
the retreater.
But
adjustments were made and soon Pacquiao shortened his shots and stopped
flurrying recklessly. Using essentially just his jab and straight left hand,
Pacquiao consistently beat Bradley's home run bombs with shorter, well-placed
shots. In the seventh and ninth rounds, Bradley tried to fight off of the
ropes, hoping to force Manny into making a mistake. Here Pacquiao performed
like a seasoned pro, landing two or three hard punches before stepping out to
reset. He would then come in with a few more shots and exit again. It was
a wonderful example of spacing, distance, effective pressure and composure. It
reminded me of Mayweather's surgical work against Alvarez when he had him
backed up against the ropes.
By the
11th round, Bradley returned to the four-corner defense, where he would retreat
around the ring and pot-shot Pacquiao with a punch or two before going on the
run again. For the record, this was still an effective play for Bradley, but it
was clear that this wasn't the statement that he wanted to make. In his mind, Bradley was
there to impose himself and assert his dominance, not to craft his way to a
decision.
The
final round essentially told the story of the last half of the fight where
Pacquiao dug down to throw more shots while remaining defensively responsible.
Bradley spent too much time waiting for the fight-ending shot that never
materialized.
It was
a very competitive bout with great swings of action. Two of the scores
(116-112) were just and the third was a little wide for my liking (118-110),
but all three judges had Pacquiao winning, and deservedly so. (I scored it
115-113 Pacquiao.)
Athletically,
Pacquiao's performance was far less than what it was against Bradley in their
first fight or Marquez in late 2012. Gone are the days of the swashbuckling,
fearless aggressor who batters opponents with 75 punches a round, blinding hand
speed, crushing power and wonderful angles. Pacquiao now fights with a lot of
breaks. His volume is no longer troublesome. He feels comfortable with
two-and-a-half punches (sometimes he will show a few right hooks).
Although
Pacquiao isn't the fearless gunslinger of the past, his new-found appreciation
of ring mortality may have won him Saturday's fight. Where Pacquiao really
distinguished himself in the rematch was his understanding of the realities of
aging and the capricious nature of boxing judges. Pacquiao learned in 2012 that
he could be stopped by either punches or rogue judges. After trading big shots
through the early rounds against Bradley on Saturday, Manny realized that he
couldn't afford to participate in that kind of war, not at 35, not with his
mileage. For his career to continue at the highest levels of the sport
something had to give, and to Pacquiao's credit he realized that jumping in
recklessly, even though it delighted his fans, was not the way to win
Saturday's match. He had to think his way through the fight, and he was
ultimately successful.
To my
eyes, Pacquiao’s performance on Saturday wasn't one of his best from an aesthetic
performance. It didn't resemble the "happy destructor" of his peak
years. But Pacquiao showed a maturity and cerebral acuity that haven’t always
been apparent throughout his career. In the past, when he was tagged with hard
shots, his answer would always be to do more, fight harder; Saturday was an
example of fighting smarter. That he prevailed with this strategy speaks to his
ring IQ and his acknowledgement that Father Time may not be so far away –
perhaps in the driveway, not yet knocking on the door.
Bradley
received a lot of criticism for his game plan on Saturday, and in some cases
deservedly so. Not a knockout puncher, Bradley loaded up on big shots but
seemed to have emptied his tank by the later rounds. It was the first time that
I had ever questioned Bradley's conditioning.
But
take a step back and his approach makes sense. He saw Pacquiao fade markedly in
the first fight. I'm sure that the plan for the rematch was to hurt him early
and weaken him significantly for the later rounds, where he could inflict more
damage or even get a stoppage. Through six rounds, the strategy was working.
Ultimately, the fight changed on Manny making an adjustment to go shorter with
his shots and smarter with his approach. For Bradley, there wasn't a real Plan
B, and that's where he deserves criticism. Through much of the back half of the
fight, it seemed that Bradley had run out of ideas, deciding to double down on
his plan to land power shots through hell or high water. Waving in Pacquiao to
the corner was a desperate maneuver, an example where he was outthought and
outcoached.
However,
let's not bury Bradley. He was far better on Saturday than he was in the first
match. He did all sorts of clever things with his right hand through the first
six rounds. He opened up Pacquiao by throwing hard rights to the body and then
followed through with overhand rights as Pacquiao was backing up or trying to
get out of the pocket. In addition, he clearly had studied Pacquiao's movement
and was successful with throwing his overhand right to a spot, anticipating
where Pacquiao would be. He landed several impressive blows.
Perhaps
Bradley outsmarted himself. Maybe he thought that there was no way that he
could win a decision by boxing (the 118-110 card helps support his viewpoint).
However, he didn't give himself the best chance to win the fight in the later
rounds. I wish Joel Diaz, his trainer, would have said, "The fight's close. Just box him
and keep throwing punches. You're right there." Instead, it slipped away.
Going
forward, Bradley has to learn how to fight more intelligently when he is hurt.
Winging wild, looping amateurish punches that hit mostly air is not a
successful move against a patient power puncher. Although Bradley's fighting
instinct is admirable, he would do much better by tying up and conserving
energy. He was barely able to survive against Ruslan Provodnikov with this
approach; it didn't work against Pacquiao. Bradley was running close to empty
as the fight ended.
Bradley
won't enjoy watching the tape from Saturday's fight. There were opportunities
missed and places where he could have done more. Pacquiao was there for the
taking, but at the final bell, Bradley lost the battles of resiliency and
adjustments.
After
both fights, Bradley complained about foot and leg injuries. Watching
Saturday's fight live, I could understand how Bradley might have hurt himself.
Trying to gain angles, Bradley contorted his body in irregular ways and then
unloaded unconventional punches with maximum torque. These aren't the types of
movements that are regularly practiced at the gym and they looked uncomfortable
just to execute.
Although
Bradley continues to demonstrate that he can compete with the best fighters at
147, he still needs to understand that being macho won't solve all of his
problems in the ring. With only moderate power and a chin that can be dented,
he will one day learn that fighting smarter, like he did against Marquez, will
be his ticket to the top. He possesses the talent and versatility to get there
but until he fully makes peace with who his best self is in the ring, he
remains vulnerable to a variety of fighters. The numbers don't lie; the 12 KOs
speak for themself.
As for
Pacquiao, he guaranteed himself at least one more big fight. And although he
might not be the whizzing specter flashing across the ring of yesteryear, in a
diminished capacity he still beat a damn good fighter, legitimately and without
controversy. In hindsight, the manner in which Pacquiao won on Saturday truly
speaks to his greatness. Should this be the last truly significant victory of his
career, it was one hell of a capper.
Adam Abramowitz is the head writer and founder of saturdaynightboxing.com.
He is also a member of the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board.
Contact Adam at saturdaynightboxing@hotmail.com
@snboxing on twitter
Follow Saturday Night Boxing on Facebook:
Contact Adam at saturdaynightboxing@hotmail.com
@snboxing on twitter
Follow Saturday Night Boxing on Facebook:
I agree with most of your article, except for the fact that I believe Pacquiao showed the best of both worlds...that is boxing and damage. But on e could only see how effective and damaging he was until you saw Bradly's face afterwards...you don't get those kind of lumps and bruises from someone who "looks" like their on their way out...no, no , no, that came from a "fighter" (as you alluded to) that has built up his ring IQ to become a more intelligent "boxer" with a fighters edge.
ReplyDelete