Monday, November 24, 2025

Opinions and Observations: Mason-Noakes

During Saturday's thrilling fight between Abdullah Mason and Sam Noakes, a key subplot was the divergence between what Valiant Mason (Abdullah's father and trainer) wanted his son to do and Abdullah's own plan for winning the fight. As early as after the first round, Valiant implored Abdullah to move more and focus on boxing, not trading power punches. But Abdullah was determined to slug it out. 

Much of the fight, which was for a vacant lightweight title, featured frenetic action. Mason fired off bombs: left uppercuts and straight lefts to the body and head. Noakes found opportune moments to counter with straight rights to Mason's head and his own uppercuts. After a more subdued ninth round where Mason boxed more, Valiant said he needed three more rounds like that one. And just as Abdullah had done throughout the fight, he mostly ignored his father's instructions and decided to freelance. After a solid tenth, he had his toughest round of the fight in the 11th where Noakes was able to deliver pulsating counters that pushed him back. 

In the end, Mason won a close but unanimous decision. Two of the judges had Mason winning 115-113, as did I, and a third had it 117-111. 

Mason (left) and Noakes went to war
Photo courtesy of Leigh Dawney/Queensberry Promotions

Although only 21, Mason has been a hyped prospect for several years. He has excited the boxing world with punishing offensive displays. In 20 fights, he's scored 17 KOs and features several knockout weapons. 

Of course, there's another side to that coin. He was dropped twice in the first round last year against Yohan Vasquez and has been fairly easy to hit throughout his career. Against Noakes, his chin held up, but his defensive shortcomings were still apparent. 

Despite Mason making Saturday's fight more difficult for himself than it needed to be, he did display several quality intangibles during the match. He exhibited a toughness throughout the fight. He didn't wilt after getting hit by solid shots. The back-and-forth exchanges didn't spook him; he was actually emboldened by them. Mason also demonstrated solid stamina, maintaining a high energy level throughout the fight. And all of these aspects were legitimate questions about him coming into the match. Factor in that he had never been past six rounds prior to Saturday and Mason passed several tests.

However, coachability is a vital intangible too, and one that can ultimately reduce a fighter's ceiling. A fighter has to trust his coach in the ring and be willing to take instruction. Without that bond with a trainer, a fighter is ultimately diminished in the ring. It worked out well enough for Mason on Saturday, but going off script isn't a long-term recipe for success. 

It's clear that there's a significant disconnect between Abdullah and his father in the ring. The question is will this daylight between them lead to a greater understanding or a chasm? 

Noakes remains a solid professional who if the right matchup occurs could one day win a title. Unfortunately, he had disadvantages with height, reach and athleticism in this matchup. He had success by countering, but he couldn't get going as a lead on a consistent basis. Even though he landed his share of solid power shots, he really isn't a true one-punch knockout artist. He likes to grind opponents down, which only works by connecting frequently and imposing one's will on the other, but he couldn't break Mason's will. However, there's no shame in this defeat. In his first title fight, Noakes performed ably. 

As for Mason, it will be fascinating to see if his high-wire act continues or if he adopts an approach that reduces risk and maximizes his chances of winning. In addition to questions of strategy and tactics, Mason also needs to address certain fundamental issues when it comes to defense. Far too often as he was bending down to go to Noakes' body with a power shot, Noakes landed short counters to Mason's unprotected head. Mason didn't make any adjustments to that dynamic throughout the fight. His answers were to throw harder punches with more force. But Noakes wasn't going anywhere. Mason will need to learn that a lot of fighters at the top level can't be knocked out; so, then what? 

Should Mason apply himself to improvement, there are still further levels that he can reach in the sport. Knowing when and where to put himself at risk will help separate himself from other quality opponents. Going to war isn't necessarily a bad thing. But going to war unnecessarily is an issue. These areas of understanding will be needed as he continues to face top opponents. He can't stand in front of big punchers for 12 rounds, not with his defense. And he also can win fights without needing to do so. 

With his win on Saturday, Mason has placed himself on the world boxing map. He's no longer an undercard secret or a prospect being developed away from the sport's bright lights. There's now a 12-round tape on him for opponents to study. He's a welcome addition to boxing's main stage. Everyone loves dynamic punchers. But for him to rise in the sport or even maintain his place, more will be required. It's his choice. 

Adam Abramowitz is the founder and head writer of saturdaynightboxing.com
He's a member of the Ring Magazine Ratings Panel, the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board, and the Boxing Writers Association of America.
snboxing on twitter. SN Boxing on Facebook 

Boxing Esq. Podcast

I appeared on Kurt Emhoff's Boxing Esq. podcast this week. We recapped the exciting Ring IV card and put our thinking caps on. Are there 12 fights that are worthy of pay per view for 2026? We made our lists. I really enjoyed the discussion.


Adam Abramowitz is the founder and head writer of saturdaynightboxing.com
He's a member of the Ring Magazine Ratings Panel, the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board, and the Boxing Writers Association of America.
snboxing on twitter. SN Boxing on Facebook 

Thursday, November 20, 2025

San Antonio Current Article on Bam-Martinez

In the latest edition of the San Antonio Current, Enrique Lopetegui previewed Saturday's Jesse "Bam" Rodriguez-Fernando Martinez fight. in the article I shared my thoughts on the matchup. To read the article, click here.

Adam Abramowitz is the founder and head writer of saturdaynightboxing.com
He's a member of the Ring Magazine Ratings Panel, the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board, and the Boxing Writers Association of America.
snboxing on twitter. SN Boxing on Facebook 

Wednesday, November 19, 2025

New Rule

In watching Erickson Lubin and Chris Eubank Jr. get blown out in consecutive weeks, I've confirmed a belief that I've held about boxing for many years. With a hat tip to Bill Maher, it's time for a New Rule in understanding boxing. The Rule is as follows: 

Any fighter who voluntarily lingers on the ropes during the early rounds of a fight has reduced his or her chances of winning. 

There are a couple of key points to parse here. Let's start with "voluntarily." What I am stating is when a fighter has his or her back to the ropes by choice, by design. It's not being forced to the ropes because of relentless pressure or recovering from punishment. It's a fighter deciding to dictate the terms of the fight by laying on the ropes early in a bout, when opponents are at their strongest.

Eubank with has back against the ropes
Photo courtesy of Mark Robinson/Matchroom

It's my belief that fewer than a handful of fighters at any given time in boxing can win fights with their back against the ropes even in the best of circumstances. It is one of the toughest skills in boxing to master in that a fighter's mobility is significantly limited. Among active fighters, Dereck Chisora is one who has displayed an ability to win fights from this position. But often, Chisora has done his best work with his back against the ropes later in fights, when opponents are diminished or have endured their own punishment (such as Carlos Takam or Joe Joyce). 

So, in the best-case scenario, there may only be a couple of fighters who can win fights with their back against the ropes, and that is later in bouts after their opponents have endured several rounds of action. Yet many fighters somehow think that they will be successful in a disadvantageous position against a clear-minded foe. 

I believe that there are two reasons a fighter goes to the ropes early: 

  1. The fighter is physically diminished (Lubin and Eubank fit this category).
  2. The fighter believes that he has a strategic advantage (think Floyd Mayweather against Marcos Maidana in their first fight). 

The first category is self-explanatory. Both Lubin and Eubank had tough recent fights where they didn't look at their physical best. Their behavior in going over to the ropes against Ortiz and Benn, respectively, confirms that they didn't believe they had the physical capacity to go 12 hard rounds in the middle of the ring. In short, they were telling on themselves. They needed a crutch even before the going got tough.  

The Mayweather example is instructive and one of the few times that he got his strategy wrong in a fight. I'm sure that Team Mayweather noticed things on tape regarding Maidana, how wide he could be with his shots, how open he could be to counters. They probably thought that going to the ropes would be a simple way to inflict damage because of Maidana's crude offensive forays.  

They were wrong.  

Instead, Maidana went to town on Mayweather in the early rounds. Mayweather fell into the classic counterpuncher's trap of trying to land perfect counters while the aggressor was banging away on a stationary target with power shots and volume.  

Eventually, Mayweather junked the strategy and wound up winning the fight in the middle of the ring. But that fight is an essential example in understanding boxing. With his back up against the ropes, the best fighter of his generation couldn't beat a capable opponent in that position. If it can't be done by Mayweather, maybe you shouldn't try it either.  

Looming in the background to all of this is Muhammad Ali's famous "rope-a-dope" strategy, where he was able to defeat the heavily favored George Foreman by spending most of the fight punching off the ropes. No doubt this is one of the cornerstone fights in the history of the sport, and perhaps Ali is the only heavyweight who could willingly endure that much punishment to win a battle of wills along the ropes against such a fierce opponent.  

But two things to consider about the Rumble in the Jungle: Ali didn't start the fight on the ropes; he had a very good first round using the entire ring. Also, Foreman's pressure was unrelenting. In the early stages of the fight, it was Foreman who drove Ali to the ropes. By the end of the second round, it seemed as if Ali had made the decision to hold his ground along the ropes instead of burn off more energy using his legs.   

The Ali-Foreman performance is essentially the exception that proves the rule. Perhaps the greatest heavyweight of all time was able to execute that strategy, but even then, he absorbed a ton of punishment. If the decision was so fraught for one of the best to ever do it, perhaps a lesser fighter shouldn't think about doing it early in a bout.  

So, to sum up, if you see a boxer go to the ropes on his own volition early in a fight, it's not a good sign. He or she either has made a strategic/tactical mistake or physically the fighter isn't right. And sure, if we watch boxing closely over the ensuing decades, we might find another exception or two. But I've seen a ton of boxing over the years, and going over to the ropes early isn't a winning strategy. You can call Ali the Greatest, but call everyone else something different – someone who's about to lose the round, or the fight. 

Adam Abramowitz is the founder and head writer of saturdaynightboxing.com
He's a member of the Ring Magazine Ratings Panel, the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board, and the Boxing Writers Association of America.
snboxing on twitter. SN Boxing on Facebook